Tim,
We ended up covering the topic, as Martin summarized in the
minutes. I didn’t notice this message until now. I have some
sense for the WTP needs from our review of the UI and discussions when we were
first working on the Mylyn Connector Discovery, but think that this entire
effort would benefit from your input. In other words, if it doesn’t
support the WTP server adapter use case something is wrong. I’ll
start out by sending a bug on the proposal, and we can schedule a separate
discussion if that would be beneficial to do before the next architecture
council meeting.
Mik
--
Dr. Mik Kersten
CEO: http://tasktop.com
Lead: http://eclipse.org/mylyn
Follow: http://twitter.com/mik_kersten
From:
eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim
deBoer
Sent: November-12-09 8:03 AM
To: eclipse.org-architecture-council
Subject: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] Regrets for today's call
Hi,
I'm stuck in
another meeting and unlikely to be able to join today's call. If the meeting
ends I'll join when I can.
I just noticed
a topic for the meeting is bug 291094 ("Do we really need 4
different ways to install adapters / extensions"). As a stakeholder I'd
like to be involved in the discussion, would prefer if this topic can be
deferred, or at least delayed until late in the call in case I can join.
Thanks,
Tim deBoer
Eclipse WTP PMC, RAD Release Architect and WebSphere Tools - IBM Canada
(905) 413-3503
deboer@xxxxxxxxxx
