[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] Notes of AC 10-Sep call are nowonline
|
Hi Tom,
thanks, I noticed your regrets. The "(again)" in my message
was only referring to BIRT and STP, but not to RT and Tools.
Thanks for your continued support for the
Council!
Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical
Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project
Lead, DSDP PMC Member
Sorry I missed the call this month. I had an unexpected conflict arise. I
was there last month (and prior meetings) representing RT though! See http://wiki.eclipse.org/Architecture_Council/Meetings/August_13_2009
Tom
"Oberhuber, Martin" ---09/10/2009 01:08:03 PM---Hi
all,
 From: |
 "Oberhuber, Martin"
<Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
 To: |
 "eclipse.org-architecture-council"
<eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
 Date: |
 09/10/2009 01:08 PM |
 Subject: |
 [eclipse.org-architecture-council]
Notes of AC 10-Sep call are now online |
Hi all,
Notes of today's call are now online:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Architecture_Council/Meetings/September_10_2009
I specially liked the discussion about
bugzilla, which took an unexpected
direction -- an
example how a live discussion can add to the value of a
bugzilla offline discussion.
Following PMC's were (again) not
represented, please work on finding
reliable
delegates for next month's meeting:
Thanks,
--
Martin
Oberhuber, Senior Member of
Technical Staff, Wind
River
Target Management Project
Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council
mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
IMPORTANT:
Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse
Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact
emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.