RE: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] F2F in June?

["Jeff McAffer" <jeff@xxxxxxxxx>]

I will be at both the board meeting and the summit.  Martin’s observation makes a lot of sense to me.  It would have to be just before the summit (23^rd is a Friday).  That is good and bad.  Could help set the scene/identify issues.  Could also result in repeated discussion or people sitting around saying “that will/should be talked about in the e4 summit”.

 

If we have it around the board meeting then I suggest that having it the day before/after would be better than in parallel.  There are a number of architects on the board and it would defeat the purpose of collocating if they could not participate.

 

Jeff

 

From: eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Oberhuber, Martin
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 4:46 AM
To: bjorn Freeman-Benson; eclipse.org-architecture-council
Subject: RE: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] F2F in June?

 

Hi Bjorn,

 

what about an EAC F2F along with the E4 summit May 22-23 in Ottawa?

 

I'd assume there are more architects interested in E4 than architects

that coincide to be board members, but I don't know for sure...

 

Cheers,

--

Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River

Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member

http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm

 

 

 

---

From: eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bjorn Freeman-Benson
Sent: Freitag, 18. April 2008 03:28
To: eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] F2F in June?

Architecture Council members,
Our last conference call didn't go as well as I had hoped mostly because we had a much larger turn-out than I had hoped! So it was good news, but a bad effect :-) Would you all like to have a F2F on June 19th in parallel with the Board meeting? A F2F will work better for this larger group than a conference call. Plus, if enough of you are willing to meet, I'd like to set up an agenda with some breakouts, etc. Of course, this will only work if enough of us attend - otherwise we'll have the opposite problem of too few people.

I think there are lots of interesting things to think about including the topic that I wanted to discuss on the phone last week: how can continue to enhance the _architcture_ of the projects to encourage more contributions. (Our phone conversation diverged into "how to post news messages to encourage contributions" which was interesting, but not what I thought we were going to talk about.)

Please RSVP to me by Wednesday the 23rd whether you would be willing to come to a June F2F for the Architecture Council.

Thanks,
Bjorn

--

[end of message]