Re: [eclipse-pmc] Oxygen (4.7) Release Review Material

["Daniel Megert" <daniel_megert@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Martin

You need to review what we shipped (or
not) according to the plan. Plus the IP log and the statement regarding
the API certification.

BTW, I agree on the dot but not on the
commas.

Dani



From:      
 "Oberhuber, Martin"
<Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:      
 "eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx"
<eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:      
 25.05.2017 17:33
Subject:    
   Re: [eclipse-pmc]
Oxygen (4.7) Release Review Material
Sent by:    
   eclipse-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

Thanks Dani,
 
I’ve only had a very quick look at the
linked review URL, since I wasn’t quite sure what material is supposed
to be reviewed. It’s linking to the Plan (which we reviewed before) and
many subprojects, but what would you like us to actually review?
 
From the toplevel pages, some comments:
-          https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/eclipse/reviews/4.7.0-release-review
o    I
think a comma is missing: “…performance improvements COMMAand improves HiDPI”
o    A
dot should be a comma: “… Oxygen Plan COMMAand the New & Noteworthy”
o    E4
project isn’t mentioned in the “Projects included with the release”,
is that deliberate? – e4 is mentioned as a subproject of Eclipse here
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/eclipse
-          https://www.eclipse.org/eclipse/news/4.7/
o    I
found it confusing that the top line talks about Oxygen simrel with 85
projects, but then the rest of the paragraph just talks about Eclipse SDK.
Makes me wonder how I would navigate to the other 84 projects’ N&N
?
o    Cosmetic,
what does the “Quip:Author” mean on the top right?
-          https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/eclipse.platform
o    Talks
about “part of Europa” with Latest release “from to June 26th,
2013”. This doesn’t look good. If the page is so outdated, we shouldn’t
link to it. But I guess it would be better updating the dates here, shouldn’t
be a horrendous effort. Or we do it like “Platform Debug” which doesn’t
have any dates.
 
I’m sorry if these comments are just cosmetic
and probably not what you’ve been looking for, but I really wasn’t sure
what you expected to be reviewed.
 
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Oberhuber, SMTS
/ Product Owner – Development Tools, Wind
River
 
From: <eclipse-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of "daniel_megert@xxxxxxxxxx" <daniel_megert@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx" <eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday 25 May 2017 at 16:53
To: "eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx" <eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [eclipse-pmc] Oxygen (4.7) Release Review Material
 
Dear PMC Members,

please review the Oxygen
(4.7) release review materialand
respond with feedback to this list. As agreed before, this comes in a minimal
version. Please respond whether you approve or decline the review by
May 31,

As already with the previous release, the IP Log is no longer attached
and part of the release review. You can review it here: https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13597.

The review itself is tracked by bug
517250: [release] Eclipse
Oxygen (4.7)        

Thanks,
Dani
_______________________________________________
eclipse-pmc mailing list
eclipse-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse-pmc