Can you describe what you would intend
by prominently available ?
To me it feels a "nice to have", but given the current p2 requirements
for 3.4M7 and 3.4.0, I am not sure you have time to accomodate non critical
issues at this point.
I also understand it got little testing
up until now...
Pascal Rapicault <Pascal_Rapicault@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: eclipse-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
04/18/2008 03:33 PM
Please respond to
"General development mailing list of the Eclipse project."
[eclipse-dev] Eclipse 3.4 shape
Since 3.4 M6, the eclipse SDK can be obtained using a p2-based installer
We need to decide if this is a delivery format that we want to promote
3.4 by making it more prominently available from our download page, but
also need to understand the consequences of such a choice on the greater
Eclipse community. The two questions that come to mind are:
- Is the installer something that would be put on
the Eclipse main
download page (http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/) in addition of the zip?
- If we answer yes to the previous question, does
it mean that an
installer has to be provided for the other EPP packages, do we have time
for it or can we leave with an inconsistency there?
Thx for your feedback,
eclipse-dev mailing list
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
Sauf indication contraire ci-dessus:/ Unless stated otherwise above:
Compagnie IBM France
Siège Social : Tour Descartes, 2, avenue Gambetta, La Défense 5, 92400
RCS Nanterre 552 118 465
Forme Sociale : S.A.S.
Capital Social : 542.737.118 €
SIREN/SIRET : 552 118 465 02430