Re: [eclipse-dev] Planning Meeting Notes - Feb 22, 2006

[Michael Scharf <Michael-Scharf@xxxxxx>]

> Workspace:
> - There has been some good discussion on eclipse-dev about how to treat
>   provisional APIs.  We should ensure we have a consistent story for
>   provisional APIs across all teams for the 3.2 release.  How should
>   they be named? Should we use x-internal? Should javadoc be generated?
>   How should we publicize them to ensure we get feedback?

I think it would be great if the conclusion/advice could be summarized
in a document, wither on eclipse.or or on the wiki.


Michael