Re: [eclemma-dev] Let's make EclEmma 3.0.0 free of a legacy not necessar

[Evgeny Mandrikov <mandrikov@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 9:37 AM Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 

Also, do you already plan to have "provisional" APIs? 

If you can avoid them as long as no-one asks for them, it's simpler for EclEmma.

No. It was just a suggestion to keep distinction for classes/interfaces from "org.eclipse.eclemma.core" for "org.eclipse.eclemma.ui".

I personally would also like to avoid APIs as long as possible.

If I were to do the work, I'd choose the x-internal/x-friend solution.

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:56 AM Lars Vogel <lars.vogel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

If it turns out that a change is necessary we can still change it, as "x-internal" gives us the right.

Thanks, guys, consensus - let's go with "x-internal" and "x-friends".

So, Marc, here is PR for review - https://github.com/eclipse/eclemma/pull/16