|Re: [ecf-dev] Luna comitment|
On 09/09/2013 07:57 PM, Scott Lewis wrote:Do we have any (empirical) data that ECF benefits from participating in
> I would like to have a public discussion about whether ECF will
> participate in the Luna release. We soon have to publicly submit our
> intention to participate or not, and although my inclination is 'yes', I
> would like to have a community discussion about this, because I may not
> have the personal resources to do all the necessary work, and it so it
> does/will require work from many if not all the existing committers
> (e.g. review materials, release engineering, as well as
> code/development/test/docs contributions, etc).
> Question: Should ECF participate in Luna next year?
> Corollary (for existing committers at least): Are you able and willing
> to commit some time to ECF work to help meet the project deadlines?
a release train? My gut feeling is that our consumers usually do not
need/use an ECF release that is synced with the rest of the release train.
Back to the top