|Re: [ecf-dev] Luna comitment|
On 09/09/2013 07:57 PM, Scott Lewis wrote: > I would like to have a public discussion about whether ECF will > participate in the Luna release. We soon have to publicly submit our > intention to participate or not, and although my inclination is 'yes', I > would like to have a community discussion about this, because I may not > have the personal resources to do all the necessary work, and it so it > does/will require work from many if not all the existing committers > (e.g. review materials, release engineering, as well as > code/development/test/docs contributions, etc). > > Question: Should ECF participate in Luna next year? > Corollary (for existing committers at least): Are you able and willing > to commit some time to ECF work to help meet the project deadlines? Do we have any (empirical) data that ECF benefits from participating in a release train? My gut feeling is that our consumers usually do not need/use an ECF release that is synced with the rest of the release train. M.
Back to the top