Re: [ecf-dev] ECF Application -- Your input requested

[Jeff McAffer <Jeff_McAffer@xxxxxxxxxx>]

http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Orbit_Faq

Chris Aniszczyk <zx@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: ecf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

11/07/2006 10:40 PM

Please respond to
"Eclipse Communication Framework (ECF) developer mailing list." <ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"Eclipse Communication Framework (ECF) developer mailing list." <ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [ecf-dev] ECF Application -- Your input requested

Jeff may want to comment further, but I think we should
strive to get comments net in Orbit (http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/org.eclipse.orbit/?cvsroot=Tools_Project)

Jeff, what's the process to get something into Orbit?

Cheers,

---
Chris Aniszczyk | IBM Lotus | Eclipse Committer | +1 860 839 2465

Jeff
McAffer ---11/07/2006 09:01:48 PM---Just want to clarify that all projects
must submit a contribution questionaire when using a third party library
regardless of w

From:	Jeff McAffer <Jeff_McAffer@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:	"Eclipse Communication Framework (ECF) developer mailing list." <ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	11/07/2006 09:01 PM
Subject:	Re: [ecf-dev] ECF Application -- Your input requested

---

Just want to clarify that all projects must submit a contribution questionaire
when using a third party library regardless of whether or not the lib has
been approved for use in another project. It is generally faster/easier
for the subsequent projects but you still have to go through IPzilla

Jeff

"Remy Suen" <remy.suen@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: ecf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

11/07/2006 07:20 PM

Please respond to
"Eclipse Communication Framework (ECF) developer mailing list." <ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"Eclipse Communication Framework (ECF) developer mailing list." <ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [ecf-dev] ECF Application -- Your input requested

Hi Javier,

The package Jakarta Commons-Net is being used by the Target Management
project of the Device Software Development Platform.
It is already available as an Eclipse plugin from the DSDP CVS repository
(
http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/org.eclipse.tm.core/thirdparty/org.apache.commons.net/?cvsroot=DSDP_Project)

It could be useful, since this package has been already approved by Eclipse.

I had totally forgot about this since I noticed several ftp stack traces
that were being filed as bugs in Bugzilla were listing Apache's commons
library. TM's RSE component is using the commons library for FTP, right?
Are there any particular reasons as to why org.eclipse.ftp from Platform
Team is not being used? Could you provide a pros/cons comparison of some
sort?

Much thanks.

Regards,
Rem_______________________________________________
ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev
_______________________________________________
ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev
_______________________________________________
ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev