| Re: [e4-dev] Re: animations |
Ø Kai said he wanted to have a look at what you've done but apparently forgot to follow up.
I am sorry, Kirill.
I was so busy with other things that I just forgot to follow up.
Best regards,
Kai
From: e4-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:e4-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Boris Bokowski
Sent: Freitag, 27. November 2009 18:58
To: E4 Project developer mailing list
Subject: [e4-dev] Re: animations
Hi Kirill,
I looked at the messages on e4-dev and the conclusion (if any) seemed to be
that the way forward would be to support animations on top of SWT (instead of
built into it). Kai said he wanted to have a look at what you've done but
apparently forgot to follow up.
I am a big fan of adding animations to e4 - can we try to revive this
discussion? As with everything, the problem is going to be who can invest time
in this, but then again, this seems like something that doesn't have to be
delivered at a certain time so could live in the e4 incubator until it is ready
to graduate.
What I would love to see is a demo (built on, for example, the photo demo) that
shows how animations at the level of the workbench can be used to improve the
user experience. For example, using animation to smooth the transition when you
switch from one view to another, or when you add or remove a view.
Would you be interested in working on this in the context of e4? More
specifically, would you be willing to contribute code you already have to the
e4 project? I could imagine animation support being another e4 work area.
Boris
Kirill Grouchnikov ---11/27/2009 12:31:32 PM---I tried to
initiate a discussion on adding animations to e4, but unfortunately it hadn't
received mu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I tried to initiate a discussion
on adding animations to e4, but unfortunately it hadn't received much
attention, and kind of died.
Thanks
Kirill
From: Mike Milinkovich
<mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "WTP PMC communications (including coordination, announcements,
and Group discussions)" <wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: E4 Project developer mailing list <e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Fri, November 27, 2009 9:13:25 AM
Subject: [e4-dev] RE: [wtp-pmc] Proposal for JSDT as a project
The phrase “...the _javascript_ debugging support currently being
developed within the e4 Project...” caught my eye.
IMHO, e4 needs a “killer app” in the way that JDT was for the original Eclipse versions. I’ve hold little hope that the JDT project in its current form could fill that role.
Is a native e4 implementation (e.g. one not relying upon the 3.x compatibility platform) of these _javascript_ tools within the scope of this project? Is aligning the release schedule of this project with e4 part of the plan?
I would also note that this project lacks diversity. All of the committers are from IBM. Who else wants to step up to participate? Can we please (pretty please!) endeavour to create more diversity on this project before it is formally created?
/mike
From: wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Nitin Dahyabhai
Sent: November-23-09 1:46 PM
To: wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [wtp-pmc] Proposal for JSDT as a project
Hello,
I'd like to propose a _javascript_ Development Tools project, based largely on
the _javascript_ Development Tools component in Source Editing. The proposal is
in the attached zip and details some of the reasoning behind the idea, and how
the plan is to still have it be part of our 3.2 Release. I'd like the PMC's
review and approval before forwarding it to the EMO.
Regards,
---
Nitin Dahyabhai
Eclipse WTP Source Editing
IBM Rational
_______________________________________________
e4-dev mailing list
e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
