[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [dtp-dev] SQLEditor not finding PlanService
|
Max,
Thank you for your reply.
Yes, I have a recognize method in my DBConfiguration class,
but it is not hitting it. In SQLToolsFacade.getCanonicalDatabaseVendorDefinitionId,
if the configuration
is not null it skips the recognize call. The call to
SQLDevToolsConfigRegistryImpl.getConfigurationByVendorIdentifier finds
a valid configuration since it only compares up to the smaller of the two
version numbers and returns with a configuration for the non-REAL version
number. And because this is not null, SQLToolsFacade.getCanonicalDatabaseVendorDefinitionId skips the call to
recognize() and eventually returns back the original vendor ID with the REAL
version number. Since getCanonical found one from the registry, shouldn't
it return IT as the vendorID?
I am still getting "No suitable plan parser found for
database:"
Is there something else I am
missing?
-francine
Hi Francine, How did you implement your
configuration's "recognize(String product, String version)" method? Did it
return true for the "REAL" version of your server?
Best Regards!
Max (Hui) Cao
Sybase Shanghai
RD
"Grimmer, Francine"
<FG120874@xxxxxxx>
Sent
by: dtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
2007-05-21 23:42
|
Please respond
to
DTP development mailing list
<dtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
|
To
| <dtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| [dtp-dev] SQLEditor not
finding PlanService |
|
Hi,
I am having a
problem trying to load my PlanService in DTP 1.5 M6. I have implemented the
classes for the planService extension point but when it comes time to initialize
the PlanService from the sqleditor.plan.BaseExplainAction class it calls the
SQLToolsFacade which is trying to use the full server version id or "REAL"
version to find my service. It eventually calls the
ProfileUtil.getDatabaseVendorDefinitionId which returns a DatabaseDefinitionId
using the full product version (server.version) number xx.xx.xx.xx (containing
major, minor, release, and build values) instead of using the 2 digit vendor
version xx.xx.
It looks like there is a problem in
SQLToolsFacade.getCanonicalDatabaseVendorDefinitionId that, even though it finds
a Configuration that matches the simple form xx.xx, it still returns the Vendor
ID with the full number. And since we do not define our services based on the
full server name (which would require us to include every maintanence release of
our database in the plugin.xml definition of the service), our services are not
getting loaded. We have noticed this problem was introduced in DTP 1.0.
Can someone respond and confirm if this is a bug or
tell me how to work around this problem?
Thank you in advance,
-Francine _______________________________________________
dtp-dev mailing
list
dtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dtp-dev
