[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
[dsdp-tm-dev] Re: [api] SystemFilter should be API
|
I'm not sure this is the correct approach for this class. Please see my
comments in the bug report.
_______________________
David Dykstal
david_dykstal@xxxxxxxxxx
"Oberhuber,
Martin"
<Martin.Oberhuber To
@windriver.com> David Dykstal/Rochester/IBM@IBMUS,
"Kushal Munir" <kmunir@xxxxxxxxxx>
02/01/2007 06:31 cc
AM "Target Management developer
discussions"
<dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject
[api] SystemFilter should be API
We should allow extenders to define their own custom filters implementing
the ISystemFilter interface. We should encourage doing so by deriving from
the base class for a default filter, SystemFilter.
SystemFilter is currently internal but should be API.
Please add notes / discuss on
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=172468
The change should be made when their is sufficient consensus.
Committers please respond with "ok"
Thanks,
--
Martin Oberhuber
Wind River Systems, Inc.
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm