[dsdp-tm-dev] [api] SystemFilter should be API

[dsdp-tm-dev] [api] SystemFilter should be API

We should allow extenders to define their own custom filters implementing

the ISystemFilter interface. We should encourage doing so by deriving from

the base class for a default filter, SystemFilter.

SystemFilter is currently internal but should be API.

Please add notes / discuss on

The change should be made when their is sufficient consensus.

Committers please respond with "ok"

Thanks,
--
Martin Oberhuber
Wind River Systems, Inc.
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm

Follow-Ups:
- [dsdp-tm-dev] Re: [api] SystemFilter should be API
  - From: Kushal Munir
- [dsdp-tm-dev] Re: [api] SystemFilter should be API
  - From: David Dykstal
- Re: [dsdp-tm-dev] [api] SystemFilter should be API
  - From: javier . montalvoorus
- Re: [dsdp-tm-dev] [api] SystemFilter should be API
  - From: David McKnight
- RE: [dsdp-tm-dev] [api] SystemFilter should be API
  - From: Stieber, Uwe