[dsdp-tm-dev] Removing "implements" allowed for M4?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[dsdp-tm-dev] Removing "implements" allowed for M4?

From: David Dykstal <dykstal@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:40:46 -0600
Delivered-to: dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev>
List-help: <mailto:dsdp-tm-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev>, <mailto:dsdp-tm-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-tm-dev>, <mailto:dsdp-tm-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

There are several cases where RSE uses "implements <interface>" toacquire access to constants. This is considered an archaic practice.All constants should be explicitly referenced. Is fixing thisconsidered an API breaking change?

---------------------------
Dave Dykstal
dykstal@xxxxxxx

Prev by Date: Re: [dsdp-tm-dev] 2.0 API Changes vs. Migration Document
Next by Date: RE: [dsdp-tm-dev] 2.0 API Changes vs. Migration Document
Previous by thread: [dsdp-tm-dev] 2.0 API Changes vs. Migration Document
Next by thread: RE: [dsdp-tm-dev] Removing "implements" allowed for M4?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs