[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [dsdp-pmc] Another item normally answered by PC rep
|
Hi David,
I'll definitely want dsdp.tm to be separate since there is
no commonality with the others.
Christian, Eric -- are you interested in consolidating MTJ
and Sequoyah?
Martin
DSDP PMC, Since you all have not been participating in the Planning
Council for several months, I wondered if another issue has slipped by without
discussion. If you haven't heard, we
are looking to "consolidate" the rows in tables such as http://wiki.eclipse.org/Helios/Participating_Projects
So that, to the extent possible, each major
row would provide one plan, one set of docuware, one check list for compliance,
etc. You currently list these three
as being separate rows dsdp.mtj
dsdp.tm dsdp.tml So you would have
three sets of plans, docuware, and checklists, etc. If that is really want you want, that's fine. I just
thought best to explicitly ask you if that's what you want, or if you would
prefer to consolidate those three into one row. There's no formal rules about consolidating, but
typically the driving force is if the subprojects are closely knit, such as work
is done "as a group", would have nearly identical reports on the compliance
checklists, etc. then maybe easier to consolidate (Eclipse, with PDE, JDT, and
Platform is one good example). But if all subprojects work independently (e.g.
the Tools sub-projects) then nothing is saved by consolidating.
Let me know if questions, or, of course, if
you have already discussed, and explicitly want them separate, as currently
listed. Thanks,
