RE: [dsdp-pmc] FW: Nag Note for Project Status Bugzillas

["Oberhuber, Martin" <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

TM is green -- only review slides and branding icon missing.

When is the release review scheduled? When are the review slides due?

Cheers,
--
Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River
Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member
http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm
 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of CLONINGER 
> ERIC-DCP874
> Sent: Freitag, 01. Mai 2009 20:12
> To: DSDP PMC list
> Subject: RE: [dsdp-pmc] FW: Nag Note for Project Status Bugzillas
> 
> TmL is good. Other than N&N, review slides and the branding 
> icon, we're
> done.  Our M7 build is probably our RC unless we find P1/P2 bugs.
> 
> -E
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Gaff, Doug
> Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 1:08 PM
> To: DSDP PMC list
> Subject: [dsdp-pmc] FW: Nag Note for Project Status Bugzillas
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> I'll be at the Planning Council meeting next Wed. TmL, TM and MTJ: are
> there any red flags you want me to raise on your projects around the
> Must Do's?
> 
> Doug
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of David
> M Williams
> Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 10:53 AM
> To: cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [cross-project-issues-dev] Nag Note for Project Status
> Bugzillas
> 
> As we come up to the end of M7, our Galileo readiness chart, at
> http://www.eclipse.org/projects/galileo_status.php
> needs much attention. 
> 
> If we went on the state of the table right now to decide who was "in" 
> Galileo, based on "must do" items for this point in cycle, there would
> only be 10 of the 35 projects. 
> 
> ACTF Visualization
> BIRT
> Data Tools
> Equinox
> GMF
> M2T
> Platform
> Subversive
> TPTP
> TmL
> 
> Congratulations to them ... but even then, those 10 still need to do
> some work for "RC1" items. 
> 
> I'm fairly sure some of these just need book-keeping ... for example,
> according to the chart, CDT has not yet declared their intent to be in
> Galileo! 
> 
> For other, non-book-keeping items, if you have not done it by 
> M7 (and it
> 
> was due by M7) you should mark as "won't fix" and explain why.
> Otherwise,
> when the Planning Council is reviewing them next week, we'll have to
> assume you not only did not do the item, but you are also not
> communicating in a cross-project, good-Eclipse-citizen 
> fashion ... which
> 
> is of course the fundamental "must-do" requirement of our simultaneous
> release! 
> 
> Please update the bugzillas by end-of-day Tuesday, so the Planning
> Council will have accurate data to discuss when we meet on Wednesday. 
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-pmc mailing list
> dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-pmc mailing list
> dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc
>