RE: [dsdp-pmc] IP-XACT component of Device Debugging

["Gaff, Doug" <doug.gaff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Mark,

I haven't proposed the separate incubator project yet to the PMC. I want
to wait until the new dev process is ratified, because then we can
consider nested sub-projects as an alternative mechanism.

Anyway, it sounds as if the current dev process supports non-mature
components in a mature product, as long as they are clearly labeled as
such.

Doug

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark Burton
> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 8:09 AM
> To: DSDP PMC list
> Cc: Anthony Berent
> Subject: Re: [dsdp-pmc] IP-XACT component of Device Debugging
> 
> As I understand it, there is another IP-XACT component, and some other
> associated tooling heading in towards VPP, which, if we set it up
right
> will be an incubator inside DSDP... Does this help? Confuse?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Mark.
> 
> 
> On 4 Apr 2008, at 21:50, Pawel Piech wrote:
> 
> > Hello PMC,
> > In recent discussions in the Device Debugging project about the 1.0
> > release, API freeze and building, we have encountered some problems
> in
> > managing the IP-XACT component.  The problem is that IP-XACT
> component
> > is not quite as mature as the other components of DD and is probably
> > not quite ready to go to 1.0 version in Ganymede time frame.
> > Additionally we have a conflict with building IP-XACT, which depends
> > on GEF, EMF, WST, and others and cannot be properly build in the +2
> > offset time frame.  I considered requesting to move the DD project
to
> > +3 offsett, but I realized that the TCF component of TM depends on
DD
> > and it would be impacted by this change.
> > So my questions are:
> > - First of all, can the Device Debugging project have a 1.0 release,
> > while the IP-XACT component is still at 0.9?
> > - If not, would it be necessary to create an incubation sub-prject
of
> > Device Debugging for this component?  Or is there such a thing as an
> > incubation component?
> > - If IP-XACT were to stay as part of Device Debugging as is, could
> > device debugging move it's build to +3 in Ganymede without causing
> > problems.
> >
> > -Pawel
> > _______________________________________________
> > dsdp-pmc mailing list
> > dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-pmc mailing list
> dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc