RE: [dsdp-pmc] IP-XACT component of Device Debugging

["Gaff, Doug" <doug.gaff@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Martin, you have TCF in TM, and it's not at the same level as TM 3.0.
How are you handling this?



> -----Original Message-----
> From: dsdp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-pmc-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pawel Piech
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 3:50 PM
> To: DSDP PMC list
> Cc: Anthony Berent
> Subject: [dsdp-pmc] IP-XACT component of Device Debugging
> 
> Hello PMC,
> In recent discussions in the Device Debugging project about the 1.0
> release, API freeze and building, we have encountered some problems in
> managing the IP-XACT component.  The problem is that IP-XACT component
> is not quite as mature as the other components of DD and is probably
> not
> quite ready to go to 1.0 version in Ganymede time frame.
> 
> Additionally we have a conflict with building IP-XACT, which depends
on
> GEF, EMF, WST, and others and cannot be properly build in the +2
offset
> time frame.  I considered requesting to move the DD project to +3
> offsett, but I realized that the TCF component of TM depends on DD and
> it would be impacted by this change.
> 
> So my questions are:
> - First of all, can the Device Debugging project have a 1.0 release,
> while the IP-XACT component is still at 0.9?
> - If not, would it be necessary to create an incubation sub-prject of
> Device Debugging for this component?  Or is there such a thing as an
> incubation component?
> - If IP-XACT were to stay as part of Device Debugging as is, could
> device debugging move it's build to +3 in Ganymede without causing
> problems.
> 
> -Pawel
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-pmc mailing list
> dsdp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-pmc