Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[dsdp-pmc] RE: [dsdp-dd-dev] RE: [dsdp-tm-dev] I am working

Hi Doug,

> Very cool, thanks Michael. At QNX we are considering adopting 
> it for our product and will work with you to flesh out any bugs. 

That sounds great :-). 

> And I agree it should be independent of TM, or the RSE at least, since
not every 
> one has jumped on that bandwagon :). I assume this means that you'll
create a 
> feature for the terminal?

Yes, that's the plan. See also Martins comments 

I hope thanksgiving slows down meetings and traffic this week, 
so I can work on the terminal.... Because I do heavy refactoring,
I'll not do it in the CVS because it will create many orphan files
in CVS and CVS is not good at moving files anyway.... Once I have a
stable version I'll check it in in one shot.

One of the big headaches is still the serial connection:
which library to use with which license. Technically I'll
remove the dependency to any serial connection implementation. 
It will be possible plug in proprietary/GPL serial backends..


> Cheers,
> Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
> Eclipse CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC Member
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-tm-dev-
> > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scharf, Michael
> > Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 11:58 AM
> > To: Device Debugging developer discussions; Target 
> Management developer
> > discussions
> > Cc: DSDP PMC list
> > Subject: [dsdp-tm-dev] I am working on
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I am currently working on the terminal view Wind River has 
> contributed:
> >
> > 
> > I started some massive refactoring on the terminal view. The major
> > goal is to separate the view from the connection contributions. The
> > work is not completed. I think it will take a few more days of work.
> > I created a bugzilla entry for further discussions:
> >
> > 
> > I added the terminal related bugs to TargetManagement/Core
> > using the following prefix in the bug summary: "[terminal]"
> > Maybe we should create a Terminal component under DSDP in
> > bugzilla.
> > 
> > I'm also not sure if TM is the right place for the terminal.
> > I think is should be independent of TM. Instead TM should use
> > is (see also bug 165177). In any case, it should be possible
> > to use the terminal without any other TM plugins.
> > 
> > I have not (yet) checked in my changes, because I am not sure
> > if the changes destabilize the terminal. If nobody has a problem
> > with a potentially unstable terminal at the moment, I can
> > check my changes in.....
> > 
> > Michael
> > _______________________________________________
> > dsdp-tm-dev mailing list
> > dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-dd-dev mailing list
> dsdp-dd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

Back to the top