Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[dsdp-pmc] RE: [dsdp-tm-dev] I am working on

Very cool, thanks Michael. At QNX we are considering adopting it for our
product and will work with you to flesh out any bugs. And I agree it should
be independent of TM, or the RSE at least, since not every one has jumped on
that bandwagon :). I assume this means that you'll create a feature for the

Doug Schaefer, QNX Software Systems
Eclipse CDT Project Lead, Tools PMC Member

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dsdp-tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dsdp-tm-dev-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scharf, Michael
> Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 11:58 AM
> To: Device Debugging developer discussions; Target Management developer
> discussions
> Cc: DSDP PMC list
> Subject: [dsdp-tm-dev] I am working on
> Hi,
> I am currently working on the terminal view Wind River has contributed:
> I started some massive refactoring on the terminal view. The major
> goal is to separate the view from the connection contributions. The
> work is not completed. I think it will take a few more days of work.
> I created a bugzilla entry for further discussions:
> I added the terminal related bugs to TargetManagement/Core
> using the following prefix in the bug summary: "[terminal]"
> Maybe we should create a Terminal component under DSDP in
> bugzilla.
> I'm also not sure if TM is the right place for the terminal.
> I think is should be independent of TM. Instead TM should use
> is (see also bug 165177). In any case, it should be possible
> to use the terminal without any other TM plugins.
> I have not (yet) checked in my changes, because I am not sure
> if the changes destabilize the terminal. If nobody has a problem
> with a potentially unstable terminal at the moment, I can
> check my changes in.....
> Michael
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-tm-dev mailing list
> dsdp-tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

Back to the top