[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
| 
RE: [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ Model
 | 
Hi,
 
The Finnish number does not recognize the 
passcode,
but when calling to US number the passcode is 
ok.
 
-Arto
  
  
  There are a number of people on right 
  now...
   
   
  |  US Toll 
  free:  | +1-877-825-8522
      | 
| Int'l or US Toll: 
   | +1-770-615-1247
      | 
| Finland: 
   | 0800770232
      | 
| Brazil: 
   | 0800-891-6245
     
     | 
| Passcode: 
   | 4293495# | 
 
   
  
  
  Ken Wallis
   
  Team Lead - RAD Tools,   Research In 
  Motion
  905-629-4746 x4369
   
  
   
  
  
   
  Hi
  I cannot access to the telco, cause I 
  get innformation thta the access code is 
  invalid?
  Are others able to 
  participate?
  -Arto
  
    
    
The description of generating 
    the model code is in CVS at  dev.eclipse.org 
    /cvsroot/dsdp/org.eclipse.mtj/mtj-home/docs/MTJ_model_codegen.ppt 
    
It is a decent start to get you generating 
    the model, although a few of the steps are missing or in the wrong 
    order. 
The architecture 
    documents that you should be looking at for more basic understanding are in 
    the same directory,  You will need to check the datestamps from CVS to 
    determine which one is the last, but look at the MTJ Release 1 Architecture* 
    documents for an intro, or the presentations we have one the eclipse/MTJ 
    website that we gave at EclipseCon. 
kevin 
--
Kevin 
    Horowitz
khorowit@xxxxxxxxxx
Expeditor Tools Development
Workplace 
    Portal and Collaboration Software
IBM - Boca Raton, 
    +1-561-862-2113
    
      
      
        | From: 
         | Christian Kurzke 
          <christian@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
       | 
        | To: 
         | Mobile Tools for The Java Platform 
          mailing list <dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
       | 
        | Date: 
         | 11/14/2007 10:43 AM 
       | 
        | Subject: 
         | Re: [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ 
      Model | 
    
    
Arto,
Can you please point us at the 
    explanation you gave before (mentioned by 
Kevin)? Maybe we can read up 
    on this before the meeting.
During the meeting - It would be good if 
    you could get us all on the 
same page. I agree we should take a few 
    minutes to address this central 
component of MTJ.
Is there any 
    presentations you have which you can send out before the 
    
meeting?
Please assume that most of us are not familiar with the 
    details of 
    EMF.
Thanks!
-Christian
Arto.Laurila@xxxxxxxxx 
    wrote:
> Hi,
> The current MTJ services are using an EMF based 
    model, that is 
> initially created with any EMF compatible 
    tool.
> The tools that Kevin is referring here and what e.g. I have 
    used is 
> the a bit older Rational Rose tool to create the UML 
    model.
> I think that even some very old version of Rose can be used 
    with this.
> Thus the same model can be done with other tools, like 
    IBM Rational 
> Architect or Modeler or what ever (or even directly 
    with the EMF).
> When thinking the current MTJ architecture, there is 
    certainly needed 
> to discuss that does team members have experience 
    on EMF or not.
> In case of that would be replaced, it pretty much 
    means that the whole 
> MTJ internal architecture have to be recoded 
    also.
> As comparing to other Eclipse based projects, some of those 
    are not 
> using EMF at all and they do model their data model e.g. 
    with plain java.
> As it is e.g. with EclipseME (Craig, correct me if 
    I'm wrong).
> Why the EMF has been used here, well that enables to 
    have a Eclipse 
> compatible and working data layer, where the initial 
    design is done
> with UML and the the MTJ related EMF layer is 
    generated from the UML 
> file. That saves a lot of coding & 
    testing time.
> In my part I have to say that if the EMF layer is 
    dropped, I may have 
> problems to participate to create the same 
    functionality again from Nokia
> point of view.
> 
    -Arto
>
>     
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
        *From:* dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>     
    [mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *ext
>     Raniere 
    Hugo-wha006
>     *Sent:* 14. marraskuuta 2007 16:33
> 
        *To:* Mobile Tools for The Java Platform mailing list
> 
        *Subject:* RE: [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ Model
>
>   
      Hi Kevin,
>
>     I’m one of the guys at 
    Motorola intending to work in MTJ. I agree
>     with you 
    that having this kind of dependencies may not be good for
>   
      the project, and one of the tasks we are proposing in this 
    MTJ
>     reboot is to have an new proposed architecture by 
    beginning of
>     next year. For sure we can review the 
    data model for this new
>     proposed 
    architecture.
>
>     During the meeting we are also 
    going to talk about the proposed
>     planning (more info 
    on mtj wiki). If the meeting time is not
>     enough to 
    discuss about the data model, we can set a new activity
>   
      in the planning to analyze the data model.
>
>   
      Best regards,
>
>     Hugo
>
> 
        
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 
        *From:* dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>     
    [mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Kevin M
>     Horowitz
> 
        *Sent:* Wednesday, November 14, 2007 11:11 AM
>   
      *To:* dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>     *Subject:* 
    [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ Model
>
>
>     
    Hi,
>
>     I realize this is a little late for 
    today's meeting, but I would
>     like to suggest that as 
    part of the reset, we open the idea of the
>     current 
    data model behind the MTJ project. The model stores all of
>   
      the relational data about devices and setup. The model is
> 
        generated using a Rational product, and then converted using 
    the
>     EMF project. Arto provided instructions at the 
    very end of our
>     relationship explaining how this code 
    is generated, but this ties
>     us to a commercial product 
    that many of our participants might not
>     have in the 
    future, and makes modifications to the underlaying
>     
    data structure difficult to maintain my team members.
>
>   
      kevin
>     --
>     Kevin 
    Horowitz
>     khorowit@xxxxxxxxxx
>     
    Expeditor Tools Development
>     Workplace Portal and 
    Collaboration Software
>     IBM - Boca Raton, 
    +1-561-862-2113
>
> 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 
    _______________________________________________
> dsdp-mtj-dev mailing 
    list
> dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
>   
    
_______________________________________________
dsdp-mtj-dev 
    mailing list
dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 
  
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential 
  information, privileged material (including material protected by the 
  solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public 
  information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended 
  recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, 
  please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your 
  system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission 
  by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.