Hi folks,
Thanks for a great meeting in Toronto two weeks ago. It’s nice
to see things coming together and to see folks stepping up for work. The
main next step for everyone is to kick off discussions on the technology
subgroups.
See many of you at EclipseCon,
Doug
Minutes and Action Items
Minutes are posted:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/DSDP/DD/Face-to-face_Toronto_22-Feb-2006
Committers
Here is the initial committer list, which has been approved
by the DSDP PMC. From here on, all new committer must be voted on by the
existing committer community. Folks with an * next to their name need to
let me know when their membership agreements are in place before I can provide
commit rights. For everyone else, you should expect your committer account
to be created in the next few days.
Doug Gaff – Wind River
Ted Williams – Wind River
Pawel Piech – Wind River
Paul Gingrich – TI
Chris Recoskie – TI
Samantha Chan – IBM
Darin Wright – IBM
Pete Nichols – IBM
Aaron Spear – Mentor
Ken Ryall – Nokia
Kirk Beitz – Freescale
Ewa Matejska – PalmSource
And as I’ve said several times now, commit rights come
with a lot of responsibility on IP due diligence. Prior to commits to
CVS, it would be good to notify the group what you plan to check-in, so we can
collectively learn about when IP due diligence is required.
Technology Subgroups
Wiki sandboxes for the technology subgroups are linked off
of the main DD page:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/DSDP/DD
From the meeting, here’s how we agreed to proceed on
the sub-groups:
·
Leader drives discussions and
prototyping on their technology. Leader initiates conference calls, starts a
wiki page, collects requirements, and investigates/delegates prototyping.
Leader is responsible for making sure the discussion is progressing. Leaders
have commit rights to DD.
·
Team members help provide
requirements and help prototype.
·
All communications should happen on
dsdp-dd-dev mailing list for visibility.
·
By next meeting: Lead should have
requirements at minimum, but should also have some prototyping if possible,
since having something to look at will generate better feedback.
Below are some open questions. Thoughts?
1. Should we create Bugzilla components for each
technology subgroup?
2. How should we setup the sandboxes in the CVS repository?