Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] [epp-dev] Does SimRel need to include EPP site (circular dependency)?

I can only recommend we do the least disruptive thing possible.  Firstly because in these corona times, it seems involvement is lower than normal.  And secondly because when ship a next release we want people to be able to update to it, so the question of whether EPP's sites will be found by existing 2020-12 installations is relevant.  These installations point at https://download.eclipse.org/releases/latest which should therefore continue to compose the EPP updates.

So again, I can only recommend caution and consideration before we redesign the whole system on whims and assumptions.


On 04.02.2021 14:04, Mickael Istria wrote:
> I thought Jonah was solving this problem and already has a "fix" for it?

I think he's solving 1 instance of this problem, but not the whole class. And the fix has some drawbacks (eg more p2 repositories necessary to install certain packages).

On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 1:58 PM Ed Merks <ed.merks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The whole community currently uses things like https://download.eclipse.org/releases/latest/ for one stop shopping for updates.   Surely changing that is not a good solution to an internal/interim releng issue.

The repo would still be present in EPP, it's just that this wouldn't contain the EPP artifacts anymore which would be in a separate repository (eg https://download.eclipse.org/technology/epp/packages/latest/ ) enabled in EPP by default. So Check for Updates from EPP packages would still work and EPP could more easily include non-SimRel-repo artifacts like JustJ.

Back to the top