Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Documentation and signing requirements for Mars

Wayne,

If you already opened a bug for the javax.persistence, can you duplicate it against https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=460094 ?  If you did not open a bug, that's fine- we already have one.

FWIW,

- Carl Anderson
WTP Build guy

Inactive hide details for Wayne Beaton ---05/05/2015 04:36:56 PM---I've gone through the list and have opened bugs for most of Wayne Beaton ---05/05/2015 04:36:56 PM---I've gone through the list and have opened bugs for most of the unsigned  JARs.

From: Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 05/05/2015 04:36 PM
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Documentation and signing requirements for Mars
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx





I've gone through the list and have opened bugs for most of the unsigned JARs.

I can't sort out how org.eclipse.gemini.jpa_1.2.0.M1.jar is being included in the composite repo.

It's in the plug-ins directory, but I don't see any references to it in any feature or any aggregator file.

Who's pulling this in?

Wayne




On 29/04/15 04:40 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
    READ THIS AND TAKE ACTION IF YOU ARE PARTICIPATING IN THE MARS SIMULTANEOUS RELEASE.

    It looks like a few features aren't implementing the rules of participation [1].
    If your project does not conform to the rules, it will fail the release review. If it does not make sense for your project to conform to the documentation and signing requirements, I will expect this to be documented in the release review materials and explicitly approved by your PMC.

    Frankly, I'm primarily concerned with making sure that the legal documentation requirements are met and that the user experience has the fewest number of surprises.

    To that end, please look at these reports. Focus on the "Bundles missing required files", "Unsigned JARs", "Feature Copyrights", and "Consistent, current licenses (SUA) in features" links. Resolve these first and then look at the rest of entries to make sure that you're getting them right as well.

    I feel very strongly that every feature should have a description that's better than "My feature". Describe the feature with one or two sentences.

    David, feel free to add your concerns to this list.

    I've got some bugs open on some SUA problems. If I've opened a bug against your project, please deal with it ASAP.

    Upcoming dates reminder:

    May 22/2015 - IP Log submission deadline
    May 29/2015 - Review materials due
    June 12/2015 - Release Review

    Thanks,

    Wayne

    [1]
    https://hudson.eclipse.org/simrel/job/simrel.mars.runaggregator.CLEAN_BUILD/60/artifact/aggregation/final/buildInfo/reporeports/index.html
    --
    Wayne Beaton
    @waynebeaton
    The Eclipse Foundation

    EclipseCon France 2015


    _______________________________________________
    cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
    cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
    To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
    https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation

EclipseCon
          France 2015_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev

GIF image

GIF image


Back to the top