Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M3

[Matthias Zimmermann <Matthias.Zimmermann@xxxxxxxxx>]

maybe i missed the point, but how is it, that the participating list [2] shows so many more projects than actf,emft,shpinx and stardust?

tx matthias

 

[2] https://projects.eclipse.org/releases/luna

 

Von: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Wayne Beaton
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. November 2013 19:12
An: cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M3

 

Thanks David

The following projects have declared that they're participating in Luna.

actf.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
emft-egf.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
sphinx.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
stardust.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build

I haven't heard from any of these projects (yet)

amp.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
dltk.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
mft.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
pdt.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
riena.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build
soa-sca.b3aggrcon - org.eclipse.simrel.build 

Project leads: If you are participating in Luna, read this [1].

Wayne

[1] http://wiki.eclipse.org/SimRel/Simultaneous_Release_Requirements#State_intent_early_.28M4.29

--
Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundation
Learn about Eclipse Projects

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature