> so they are actually useful to end-users.
Actually, we have no evidence that users find packages useful. They download them because what else is there for them to do. Then if they are experienced, they
know what’s included and how to install the missing pieces. If not, they thrash on forums wondering why Eclipse for Java Developers doesn’t come with an XML editor.
We can certainly measure the value of maintaining a menagerie of packages. All it would take is to put out an everything package alongside the existing ones and
compare download numbers.
While it wouldn’t happen overnight, a single Eclipse IDE would have a unifying effect on the community, ultimately leading, I believe, to higher overall quality.
On 07/30/2013 12:35 AM, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:
Would user experience be better if there was only one Eclipse package on the main download site that had pretty much everything that’s in the aggregated repository?
I really don't think so.
Packages are a good way to start which includes most available relevant stuff for release-train.
The package would be too large. With modern download speeds, I suspect most users would rather wait a few minutes longer for Eclipse to download than spend time later trying to figure out how to install the missing pieces. The disk space difference is
also inconsequential these days.
A lot of people would feel better with something lighter to achieve the same goal. If Eclipse goes to 1.5G to download whereas NetBeans is 200M, people would probably
try NetBeans first, and adopt it.
2. The users prefer to not include pieces in their installation that they don’t use. I can see that being the case for some advanced Eclipse users, but I don’t believe this holds true across the user base. I suspect that most users
would rather spend time on their development project than tuning their Eclipse installation.
A frequent complaint is that Eclipse contains too many things for usage, so many UI entries make usage more complicated and confusing. I can imagine that people
doing some GMF stuff really don't want WTP at all because it introduce a lot of new menus, so a GMF user which is used to the Modeling package would spend more time to find the relevant menus for his work, and this is pretty annoying.
3. Too many plugins in one installation leads to poor user experience. If there are problems like that, we should be identifying and fixing them.
Eclipse is very heterogeneous in term of quality and ergonomics. That's something I'm afraid that can't be fixed easily because of the community being heterogeneous
itself. Just hoping we increase and unify the usage experience for all projects in the release train seems totally unachievable.
Although people complain about installation taking some time, it's a yearly effort. Having a single package with everything installed introduce a lot of noise
to end-user which can be very annoying and reduce productivity every day. I really think that good IDEs are not the ones that do everything, but rather the ones that do correctly what we want to do.
Packages are not-that-bad, and it appears that most of them already have an interesting number of downloads, so they are actually useful to end-users. I don't see any indicator saying that they are bad for adoption of Eclipse.
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list