Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7

Not for M7 ... just has to be fixed by the time you release. (And, note, "" is normally not best choice for "provider" ... it is acceptable if that's what your project and PMC want, and you are consistent about it ... but "Eclipse <project name>" often looks better, is more descriptive and modern looking, IMHO.  I would agree its not worth re-spinning M7 just for that.

From:        Ahmed Wafa <ahmed.samir.wafa@xxxxxxxxx>
To:        Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date:        05/08/2013 03:04 PM
Subject:        Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7
Sent by:        cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

I had a question. After I looked at the reports, I noticed that one of our plugins was missing the "about.html" file and that it didn't have "" as vendor. I added them now but I need to run the build and deploy and I can't cause there's something wrong with Hudson. Is it possible that we have trouble because of this ("about.html" and Vendor being missing in a plugin)?

Thanks in advance,

On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Markus Knauer <mknauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:09 AM, David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
2) I've not seen a green build for EPP for M7 and in talking to Markus, he's not had time to work on it yet, getting RAP contribution ready ... so, in other words ... I sure hope no one (such as my Platform builds, broke the EPP builds!)

I am positive... an EPP test-build is running and the first part (p2 metadata generation) was successful.

Thanks for your patience...


cross-project-issues-dev mailing list


cross-project-issues-dev mailing list

Back to the top