Not for M7 ... just has to be fixed by
the time you release. (And, note, "Eclipse.org" is normally not
best choice for "provider" ... it is acceptable if that's what
your project and PMC want, and you are consistent about it ... but "Eclipse
<project name>" often looks better, is more descriptive and
modern looking, IMHO. I would agree its not worth re-spinning M7
just for that.
Ahmed Wafa <ahmed.samir.wafa@xxxxxxxxx>
Cross project issues
05/08/2013 03:04 PM
Status and outlook for M7
I had a question. After I looked at the reports, I noticed
that one of our plugins was missing the "about.html" file and
that it didn't have "Eclipse.org" as vendor. I added them now
but I need to run the build and deploy and I can't cause there's something
wrong with Hudson. Is it possible that we have trouble because of this
("about.html" and Vendor being Eclipse.org missing in a plugin)?
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:09 AM, David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
2) I've not seen a green build for EPP
for M7 and in talking to Markus, he's not had time to work on it yet, getting
RAP contribution ready ... so, in other words ... I sure hope no one (such
as my Platform builds, broke the EPP builds!)
I am positive... an EPP test-build is running and the
first part (p2 metadata generation) was successful.