Thanks David. I'll be looking for this during release reviews.
Wayne
On 04/08/2013 10:14 AM, David M
Williams wrote:
I spent some time
improving the "provider names" report, mostly for bug 400235.
So it should be more accurate now.
http://build.eclipse.org/simrel/kepler/reporeports/reports/providerNames.html
Besides the appalling number of
cases of "null" or "unknown" given for "Provider name" (which
has always been true) I noticed a number of cases where people
were giving the name of a company for provider name ... this
is ok for a bundle that is a true "third party" bundle, but
... seems a fairly large number have been introduced for
"org.eclipse .... " bundles. This seems wrong ... sort of
against the spirit of Eclipse. The "Provider Name" should be
"Eclipse <project name>". Here's a few that stood out
... but, could be others.
org.eclipse.gemini.jpa 1.1.0.RC1
Oracle Corporation
org.eclipse.libra.framework.core
0.3.0.201212132137
Eteration A.S.
org.eclipse.ptp.rm.ibm.platform.lsf.ui
1.0.0.201303201633
IBM
org.eclipse.emf.diffmerge.sdk.feature.feature.group
0.1.0.v20121203-0924
Thales Global Services S.A.S.
Please fix as many of these
"Provider Names" as possible ... it'll make Eclipse look much
more professional when people look at the "about box" and
similar.
Thanks,
[1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=400235
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev