Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Reminders for Juno SR2 final steps

*If* respinning SR2 is in order, is it possible to include m2e 1.3.1 as well (instead of 1.3.0)?
This is far less critical than eGit, (https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=400520http://git.eclipse.org/c/m2e/m2e-core.git/commit/?id=95b254ecec2b1cb723a6d2ae4fb7a47a394c2dcb) but it's a very safe change and would spare users the hassle to manually update m2e.

Just saying :-)

Fred

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Oberhuber, Martin <Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

+1 for respinning, and declaring Juno SR2 early next week.

 

Thanks,

Martin

--

Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Architect – Development Tools, Wind River

direct +43.662.457915.85  fax +43.662.457915.6

 

From: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ian Skerrett
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 2:19 PM


To: 'Cross project issues'
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Reminders for Juno SR2 final steps

 

I think we need to look at respinning SR2.  For the last 18 months we have been pushing the entire community towards git, so now introducing a significant regression into eGit would just be bad news for our users.

 

 

 

From: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Markus Knauer
Sent: February-22-13 5:33 AM
To: Cross project issues
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Reminders for Juno SR2 final steps

 

No, I wasn't aware of this bug which is a bit scary, thanks for bringing it up here on cross-projects. Today I am trying very hard to stay calm, but it seems that this is not that easy.

Some of my thoughts...

- I think it's too late to stop Juno SR2 with this kind of bug. I would proceed today as planned, everything else seems to involve a very high risk.
- Discuss possible workarounds/solutions for Juno SR2 in parallel...
- If I were a member of the EGit team, I would try to educate my users how to upgrade to 2.3.1 via wiki, blog posts, newsgroup/forum, mailing list, other channels...

Regards,
Markus

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Gunnar Wagenknecht <gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Greetings,

I'm sorry if this has been brought up and discussed elsewhere already. But there is a severe bug in EGit that makes EGit 2.3.0 shipped in Juno SR2 a high risk for users.

See here for details:
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/egit-dev/msg03039.html

Am 19.02.2013 18:04, schrieb David M Williams:

 

This week or next, update your b3aggrcon files with your "final
location" so the Juno aggregator could in theory be ran again. We don't
plan to, but, you never know. (And, don't forget to update Kepler, if
you are using the same input for that.)

 

Given that there is a severe bug in EGit. Isn't there a chance to update the repo and the packages with EGit 2.3.1?

I understand that it's very late in the game. But the packages will stay there forever on Eclipse.org for download by everbody. Those packages will contain an EGit version that contains a know bug which may delete uncommitted source code in a working copy.

-Gunnar

--
Gunnar Wagenknecht
gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://wagenknecht.org/
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev




--

###
EclipseSource Group
Telefon: +49 721 664733-0 (GMT +2)
Telefax: +49 721 66473329

http://eclipsesource.com
 
Innoopract Informationssysteme GmbH
Lammstrasse 21, 76133 Karlsruhe Germany
General Manager: Jochen Krause
Registered Office: Karlsruhe, Commercial Register Mannheim HRB 107883

_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev




--
"Have you tried turning it off and on again" - The IT Crowd

Back to the top