Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and Outlook for Juno!

> Could this be a bogus hit?

Absolutely not! :)

Its just the last day is a rapidly changing one! Ironic?

Virgo noted to this list already they'd just fixed the features licenses and indeed the latest report is clean for features:

some regressions? (or new content?) with problematic about.html files?

The test/reports might always have quirks or bogus hits, so I don't mind at all if people think they've found one to open bugs, etc.

From:        Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:        cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx,
Date:        06/13/2012 01:14 PM
Subject:        Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and Outlook for Juno!
Sent by:        cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

Thanks for the summary, John.

On 06/13/2012 09:45 AM, John Arthorne wrote:

2) 10 features with no license (in particular their license is the string "%license"). 1 from Virgo, 9 from Gemini. The most common cause of this is missing key in file, or the file itself is not included in the bin.includes list in the feature's file.
I took a quick look at a couple of the Virgo features and the Gemini Web feature, and they seem to be okay with regard to licenses. The file is included, it has the "license" key (the build file is also correct). AFAICT there hasn't been a recent update the feature files. Could this be a bogus hit?

The Gemini Web feature appears to have been removed anyway...


Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
Eclipse Projects_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list

Back to the top