Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7
> ... contain older version of m2e. Is this
> expected at this point or should I start investigating?
I'd investigate. I assume you are expect something later than 1.1.0? Looks like your m2e.b3aggrcon file has not been updated since November of last year? (When it was changed from 1.0.0, to 1.1.0).
Igor Fedorenko ---05/06/2012 04:41:01 PM---Hello, David, Staging repository  appears to contain older version of m2e. Is this
From: Igor Fedorenko <ifedorenko@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 05/06/2012 04:41 PM
Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for M7
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Staging repository  appears to contain older version of m2e. Is this
expected at this point or should I start investigating?
On 12-05-06 3:38 PM, David M Williams wrote:
> Yes ... its here, M7 week! And, I'm already giving status!
> First thing to note it that we now have a stand-alone 4.2 primary build
> from the Eclipse Project, so for the first time we have a pure and
> correct 4.2 repo. In the past, some things from 3.8 were "slipping in"
> through aggregation due to the way the platform was producing and
> partially (unknowingly) combining 3.8 and 4.2. But no more, 4.2 only.
> One impact of this, is the bundle 'org.eclipse.help.appserver' is no
> longer available ... it was actually removed in 4.1, but it is being
> left in the 3.x stream, even though 3.8 does not use it. It now
> correctly does _not_ show up in 4.2 repo via aggregation.
> And, this "broke" BIRT ... so, I disabled that, which rippled across 3
> or 4 others that depend on BIRT charting.
> I hope BIRT can live without that old bundle and use the jetty server
> now provided by the platform (and used by the help system, in both 3.8
> and 4.2).
> Then there were the (fairly) usual breakages in RAP runtime and Virgo
> based on assumptions on certain platform specific versions, so I
> disabled those to get a green build, and promote an initial M7 version
> to staging. Be sure to check the reports (based on staging) to get as
> much cleaned up as possible before M7:
> In all, the following files have disabled repositories or features. It
> looks worse than it is, but we need to get in completely "enabled" in
> the next few days (or, remove it, if its some old thing that should not
> even be there any longer).
> As always questions and clarifications are welcome.
> Thanks everyone,
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list