|[cross-project-issues-dev] Counting Indigo Projects|
Last year, it was very difficult to determine participation numbers . Depending on how we counted, there were four very different numbers. I think this makes us look a little silly.
This year, I expect to receive exactly one IP Log and one review document for each project that has opted in. More specifically, projects that are participating at an aggregate level should provide me with one IP Log and one review document that includes information for all the aggregated subprojects. Recall that we asked for a short description (~ one paragraph) from each project last year. I believe that this was valuable and think we should do it again this year. Let me know if you have a different opinion. Again, I expect to receive one paragraph for each project that opts-in (I'll set up a wiki page).
Web Tools, for example, opts into the simultaneous release at the top-level; they provide me with one roll-up IP Log and one combined review document for the many sub-projects. The Tools project is different in nature, and instead lets its projects opt-in individually, with each providing its own IP Log and Review documentation. Both work fine, let's just keep the manner in which we participate consistent. In my mind, if you are opting in at an aggregate level (say a second-level project aggregating several nested third-level projects), then that means you've probably got a shared build and provide shared downloads. If this isn't the case, then this might be a really good time to rethink your participation strategy. Of course, this is just how I think (and is merely a guideline), and I defer to the wisdom of the community and Planning Council.
If the provided tools are a problem let me know (I hope to release the new and improved IP Log Tools very soon). If this just isn't practical for you, then maybe you're not participating at the right level.
I am prepared to help you start getting your IP Log and release documentation ready now. If you're not sure if you need a CQ, need some help determining how to mark bugs and patches for inclusion in your log, or have other process-related questions, let me know. Incubating projects can also engage with their Architecture Council Mentors to make sure that this gets started early.
Please make sure that your project plans are up-to-date. Please also ensure that your project's Indigo release is indicated in the Developer Portal with appropriate links to your new and noteworthy and (eventually) approved IP Log. While you're in the portal, please also make sure that your project's descriptionurl and paragraphurl fields  point to simple HTML documents containing a medium-length and short (respectively) description for your project. Neither of these fields should contain a link to your project's website (doing so makes your project's summary page look terrible). If this information is consistently provided, then I have a fighting chance of automating summary documents and such (and then you don't have to bother with that sort of thing).
Be aware that the IP team will be making an announcement shortly with regard to cut-off dates for IP reviews. Get your Third-party library CQs for Indigo releases in quickly (sooner is better than later).
If any of this causes you concern, please let me know. This seems reasonable to me, but I understand that there may be mitigating circumstances to consider (hopefully I've demonstrated my desire to be flexible and reasonable).
Thanks, Wayne  http://dev.eclipse.org/blogs/wayne/2010/06/11/helios-by-the-numbers/  http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/HOWTO/Project_Meta-Data
Back to the top