Hi David,
I completed the rebuild and updated the b3aggrcon file. I assume I
don't have to add "enabled=true" in the file, but if that is
necessary, please feel free to do so.
I hope this solves the problem.
-- Jeff J.
On 09/09/2010 05:39 PM, David M Williams wrote:
Thanks for letting us
know.
I know there's still some work
going
on to address bug 324419 (to get LinusTools back in)
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=324419
So, I'll keep an eye on things
and make
sure, one way or another, we get at least one more good "build"
this evening ... if not two.
Thanks,
From:
Steffen Pingel
<steffen.pingel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
Cross project issues
<cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
09/09/2010 04:10 PM
Subject:
Re:
[cross-project-issues-dev]
Status and outlook for SR1 RC3 -- are we in trouble? -- no
longer
Sent by:
cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
We are running a bit late but would like to
contribute
another Mylyn build for RC3 later today to fix an important bug.
I am expecting
to kick off the build soon so the contribution should be ready
by ~3.30
PM PDT if all goes well.
Steffen
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:16 AM, David M Williams
<david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Thanks Kim (and John) .... that
seemed
to do the trick and we actually got a green build on the first
try! Hopefully
that's give others (especially all the +3 teams) to finish up on
time today.
I did promote the successful build to
http://download.eclipse.org/releases/maintenance/
so some preliminary packages could be created by end of today
and some
early repo testing done, for those teams that want/need to do
that.
- - - - - -
> Plus, there's been no comment in bug 324419
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=324419
> which was blocking LinuxTools from contributing last week.
There has at least been some comments in this bug now ...
there's not an
obvious solution yet, but we'll see if we can come up with
something to
get LinuxTools back on the train.
- - - - - -
@Beth
> When is the aggregation of the repo likely to run?
Already happened ... at least the rep creation, if that's what
you meant.
Others will be kicked off within 15 minutes of someone
committing a change
to the b3aggrcon file.
(If I am missing the point of your question, feel free to ask
again).
Thanks everyone .. maybe there's hope after all :)
From: Kim
Moir <Kim_Moir@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Cross
project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 09/09/2010
09:22 AM
Subject: Re:
[cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for SR1 RC3 -- are
we
in trouble yet?
Sent by: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
I've cleaned up our repo. David, if you could try another build
that
would be great. The content in our aggregator files has not
changed.
Kim
The Eclipse and Equinox features are consistent from my
parsing of the
metadata for the last few builds. However there is an older
version of
"org.eclipse.equinox.server.p2"
being picked up by the aggregation that doesn't match what is
in the latest
platform build. I think we should be discarding our old builds
that are
still hanging around in our repository because somebody is
picking them
up. I'll chat with Kim about it.
Yes, I think we are in trouble. We haven't had a good build in
two days.
I'll admit Monday was a holiday for a lot of people .... but
... it's now
Thursday ... +3 day!
I didn't pay much attention to the failures at first,
expecting them to
be fixed soon, but I think they may have all been similar to
the latest
one, see summary notice attached below or full console log at
https://build.eclipse.org/hudson/view/Repository%20Aggregation/job/helios.runAggregator/345/console
It appears that Eclipse platform and Equinox have some
inconsistencies?
(In a brief note from Kim, she thought it might be related to
features
losing their distinctive version qualifier suffix (bug 208143
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=208143)
and she was hoping "the next build" would fix that. Apparently
not?
What scares me is once Eclipse/Equinox is fixed, I'm sure
there will be
several more issues, as there often is with Jetty and RAP
having exact
dependency versions ... hopefully they can react quickly, if
that's still
the case.
Plus, there's been no comment in bug 324419
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=324419
which was blocking LinuxTools from contributing last week.
By all rights, if we are on day +3 and the day +0
contributions have not
built yet, the whole schedule slips out 2 or 3 days.
I am hoping we can avoid that. Perhaps if we all get out of
"holiday
mode" and focus on the simultaneous release builds on Thursday
we
can recover? Let's assess schedule changes at the end of
Thursday (or early
Friday).
Thank you .... and good luck!
----- Forwarded by David M Williams/Raleigh/IBM on 09/08/2010
11:39 PM
-----
From: David
M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
To: Kim
Moir <kmoir@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David
M Williams/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
Date: 09/08/2010
04:51
PM
Subject: [HeliosAggregation]
Failed
for build 2010-09-08_16-46-02
The following errors occured when building Helios:
Software being installed:
all.contributed.content.feature.group 1.0.0
Only one of the following can be installed at once:
[org.eclipse.equinox.p2.artifact.repository
1.1.1.R36x_v20100901,
org.eclipse.equinox.p2.artifact.repository
1.1.1.R36x_v20100823,
org.eclipse.equinox.p2.artifact.repository 1.1.0.v20100513]
Cannot satisfy dependency:
all.contributed.content.feature.group 1.0.0
depends on: org.eclipse.equinox.sdk.feature.group
3.6.1.r361_v20100903-7H7R07v8rtOZyYbv1I6aZgou5z07
Cannot satisfy dependency:
all.contributed.content.feature.group 1.0.0
depends on: org.eclipse.sdk.ide 3.6.1.M20100908-0800
Cannot satisfy dependency:
org.eclipse.equinox.p2.user.ui.feature.group
2.0.1.r361_v20100903-897HFZFFZRuSD2LMtVxyz0Vr depends on:
org.eclipse.equinox.p2.artifact.repository
[1.1.1.R36x_v20100901]
Cannot satisfy dependency:
org.eclipse.equinox.sdk.feature.group
3.6.1.r361_v20100903-7H7R07v8rtOZyYbv1I6aZgou5z07
depends on: org.eclipse.equinox.serverside.sdk.feature.group
[3.6.0.v20100421-7u7NFVgFN5JdPKPhDHd_6Yqc54uw]
Cannot satisfy dependency:
org.eclipse.equinox.server.p2.feature.group
1.0.0.v20100503-7x7IFGOFQ74dz0POCNUBj98N depends on:
org.eclipse.equinox.p2.artifact.repository
[1.1.1.R36x_v20100823]
Cannot satisfy dependency:
org.eclipse.equinox.serverside.sdk.feature.group
3.6.0.v20100421-7u7NFVgFN5JdPKPhDHd_6Yqc54uw depends on:
org.eclipse.equinox.server.p2.feature.group
[1.0.0.v20100503-7x7IFGOFQ74dz0POCNUBj98N]
Cannot satisfy dependency: org.eclipse.sdk.ide
3.6.1.M20100908-0800 depends
on: org.eclipse.equinox.p2.user.ui.feature.group
[2.0.1.r361_v20100903-897HFZFFZRuSD2LMtVxyz0Vr]
Check the log file for more information: https://build.eclipse.org/hudson/view/Repository%20Aggregation/job/helios.runAggregator/345/console
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
--
Steffen Pingel
Committer, http://eclipse.org/mylyn
Senior Developer, http://tasktop.com_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
|