Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for RC4 +1

[Thomas Watson <tjwatson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

That would be jetty. See bug https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=315644 for the details.

Tom



John Arthorne ---06/08/2010 08:21:15 AM---David Williams wrote on 06/07/2010 06:12:57 PM:

From:	John Arthorne <John_Arthorne@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:	Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	06/08/2010 08:21 AM
Subject:	Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Status and outlook for RC4 +1

---

David Williams wrote on 06/07/2010 06:12:57 PM:
> In case there's any doubt, here's my +1 
> for the platform (equinox) re-contribution post RC4 +0 (from 
> previous note to this list), on behalf of the Planning Council.   
> It seems appropriately severe and "cross project" enough to justify it. 
> 
> I will be explicit though, this should not require others to have to
> rebuild or be late with their own contributions. (Or, if I'm wrong 
> about that, please let us know here on this list!). 

I seem to recall there is an RT project that includes features from the platform, which always requires updating whenever we have a new contribution. If this is the case, I expect they will also need to contribute for "Helios Final" week. 

John_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev