[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [cross-project-issues-dev] platform will beresubmitting tocallisto
|
Thanks, david. Now I feel better, and can go to
sleep....
-wenbin
No, nothing to do from your side. The internal replication and
"download" updates have been turned off until all is ready. I believe current
schedule is that it will be announced and turned back on around noon on
Friday. Check back then .... well, if that's not too late for your timezone :)
"Wenbin He"
<whe@xxxxxxxxxxx> Sent
by: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
06/30/2006 02:38 AM
Please respond
to Cross project issues
<cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
To
| "Cross project issues"
<cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Sue Lee"
<slee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
| naci.dai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
Subject
| RE: [cross-project-issues-dev]
platform will be resubmitting
tocallisto |
|
David:
BIRT 2.1 GA is uploaded to Eclipse site, and
ready to be mirrored. But it doesn't show up in the Eclipse download link. Is
there anything needed to be done from our side?
thanks,
-wenbin
-----Original
Message-----
From: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of David
M Williams
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 11:31 PM
To:
Cross project issues
Cc: naci.dai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] platform will be resubmitting
tocallisto
Gee, I go offline a
few hours and look at all the fun I miss!
I'm hoping Naci Dai can update our parts of WTP
effected (while I sleep :) and announce here soon on the outcome.
It sounds like
for WTP or TPTP the update site jars themselves are not effected.
What about the Eclipse
Project's update site files ... I have not noticed the features-ep.xml file
updated with a new version.
So, just to confirm explicitly, are these jars
not effected?
Also, I noticed emf and gmf changed their feature-zzz.xml files
recently ... is that any substantial change that should cause me to
re-run
my scripts? I do not think so, a quick compare looked like it was just
changing the "temporary" areas back to their
permanent areas ... but, emf
and gmf teams, please confirm if I've misunderstood and there is something I
need to do.
Thanks,
Kim Moir
<Kim_Moir@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent by:
cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
06/29/2006 09:21 PM
Please respond
to Cross project issues
<cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
To
| Cross project issues
<cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
| platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
Subject
| [cross-project-issues-dev]
platform will be resubmitting to
callisto |
|
The platform will
be resubmitting to Callisto. Late today we discovered incorrectly built
library included in SWT for some Linux platforms. We have rebuilt the
SDK and will have bytes to upload later this evening. The library is not
used in normal Eclipse operation so there is no need for another Go/No-Go
round. The SWT team has confirmed that the new content is correct.
This new build will be bytewise compared to the original 3.2 build to
ensure that only the expected changes occurred.
This rebuild impacts TPTP and WTP
as they embed parts of the SDK in their downloads. They have been
informed of the situation and we are coordinating with them to create new
downloads with the updated content.
This is a summary of what is happening:
- We have started a build M20060629-1905.
- The existing 3.2 build on the
eclipse.org servers has been deleted
- Once the build is ready. Around midnight,
when the tests are complete, we will resubmit to Callisto.
In parallel, WTP and TPTP will be
able to resubmit their contributions to Callisto
- Once all contributions have been
updated, the mirrors should be given the official go to rsync with a further
request that ALL mirrors rsync even if they did so earlier in the
day.
The
platform team is asking that the official Callisto announcement be delayed
from 9am until later in the afternoon (e.g., 1400ET) when more mirrors will
have the new build.
Kim_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev
mailing
list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
_______________________________________________
cross-project-issues-dev
mailing
list
cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev