[cdt-releng-inbox] [Bug 316208] CDT git migration

[bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx]

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=316208
Product/Component: CDT / cdt-releng

--- Comment #49 from James Blackburn <jamesblackburn+eclipse@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-06-10 04:28:26 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #48)
> Excellent. Thanks James. Any thoughts on EDC? 32MB versus 83MB for the rest is
> pretty significant. But then so is the pain of optional parts of the CDT build.

Given it adds an additional 50% space requirement, and it has an external TCF
dependency, I'd be tempted to leave edc in a separate repo.

> Also, could we put all the features into the releng directory? These should
> hardly ever change except when we're playing around with the releng.

I'm not sure about this one... Where features are part of a component, to me it
makes sense to keep them there.  So if we ever decided to split out a component
having the feature go along with the referenced plugins would be reasonable,
no? 

I think the features currently look like this: 

find . -type d -name *-feature
./build/org.eclipse.cdt.gnu.build-feature
./codan/org.eclipse.cdt.codan-feature
./cross/org.eclipse.cdt.build.crossgcc-feature
./cross/org.eclipse.cdt.launch.remote-feature
./debug/org.eclipse.cdt.gdb-feature
./debug/org.eclipse.cdt.gnu.debug-feature
./dsf-gdb/org.eclipse.cdt.gnu.dsf-feature
./dsf/org.eclipse.cdt.examples.dsf-feature
./jtag/org.eclipse.cdt.debug.gdbjtag-feature
./memory/org.eclipse.cdt.debug.ui.memory-feature
./p2/org.eclipse.cdt.p2-feature
./releng/org.eclipse.cdt-feature
./releng/org.eclipse.cdt.platform-feature
./releng/org.eclipse.cdt.sdk-feature
./releng/org.eclipse.cdt.testing-feature
./upc/org.eclipse.cdt.bupc-feature
./util/org.eclipse.cdt.util-feature
./windows/org.eclipse.cdt.msw-feature
./xlc/org.eclipse.cdt.xlc.sdk-feature

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.