RE: [cdt-patch] Patch for a new Join Lines action for the editor

[Doug Schaefer <DSchaefer@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Todd,

Actually, you can use the cdt-dev list for these kinds of questions that
other developers are probably also interested in. The patch list is really
just for notifications about patches.

Comments below...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-patch-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-patch-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of lucky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 3:51 PM
> To: CDT patches and commits are posted to this list.
> Subject: RE: [cdt-patch] Patch for a new Join Lines action for the editor
> 
> I had a question about branches. I notice that my patch has been applied
> to the HEAD
> since I get the updates when I update CVS. Should I be contributing
> patches
> against the HEAD or a different branch? I notice on the cdt-dev list
> that there
> was talk of cdt_3_0 and I see that branch in CVS.

Yes, work off of HEAD for your work. We are leaving cdt_3_0 for our next
maintenance release and "should" only contain bug fixes.

> 
> > Take a look at the Export -> Deployable features or Deployable plugins
> and
> > fragments. You can create your own zip file that you can install.
> 
> My question above is partly driven by this. If I create a plugin from my
> local
> CVS code, then it has a version of 3.0.0, whereas I have CDT 3.0.1
> installed,
> and therefore the updates are not available as they exist in a plugin
> with
> an older version.

Oops. You are correct. I haven't upversioned the plugins yet. I'll do that
now, especially now that I think we've picked a version number for the next
release off of head (i.e. 3.1.0).

> Thanks
> 
> Todd

No, thank you,
Doug