Thank you Jonah, this will be a huge improvement for the CDT development as it’s been a challenge to get a “green” build..
😊
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
From: cdt-dev <cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Behalf Of Dominic Scharfe
Sent: den 8 november 2022 13:36
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Test stability
+1, thanks Jonah!
Dominic
On 11/8/22 00:25, Jeff Johnston wrote:
Hi folks,
Over the last couple of weeks I did a big push to stabilize the test suite with the goal of every run getting a green tick. The stability of the build changed quite a bit for the worse with Java 17 + GitHub actions. This change exposed
problems, mostly in the test suites, but some actual bugs have been fixed too.
The GitHub actions runs the test suite much faster than Jenkins, so I have turned off Jenkins checks on PRs now as it is redundant.
As part of this I improved and expanded the
testing document so that others can reproduce issues better.
Please raise new issues if you see an unstable test and I'll try to fix it.
I have now fixed - or at least made a change which I think fixes - every flaky test that I have seen in the past few weeks.
Please raise new issues if you see other flaky tests. I would like to keep this number to 0 so that all PRs get green checks.
—
Reply to this email directly,
view it on GitHub, or
unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: <eclipse-cdt/cdt/issues/117/1306324743@xxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
|