Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] LLVM/Clang toolchain broken

Hi Joost,

Thank you for your analysis up until this point.

In my new role as CDT project lead there are a number of areas that I am simply not familiar with (yet!) and this is one of them. 

I can try to provide some background, and I will be very happy to review any patches you provide!

To answer some of your questions:

The LLVM plug-ins were added in Bug 338553 and haven't changed much since then in the particular area of the code you have highlighted. 

From a quick look at this it seems there is a confusion in this code between settings passed to the LLVM compiler and those passed to the CDT indexer and which tool is "in charge". In simple cases that difference probably doesn't matter, but it clearly quickly goes wrong (the case in Bug 527757 is particularly obviously bad).

> - Is there any (high level) design documentation available for the LLVM managedbuilder stuff? Or for GCC?

Have a look at it contains design documentation for when managed build was first added and has a number of links that may be useful. 

> - Why is there a CDT LLVM preference page? What is/was it's purpose?

I don't know. There may be answers in the Petri's thesis, but the link to it is dead (see comment).

> There is no such page for GCC?

Because it probably shouldn't exist for LLVM either?

> - I cannot find UI for LLVM/Clang project properties. Can someone
enlighten me?
> - The same for the GCC project properties?

It is in the Project Properties -> C/C++ Build -> Settings. (see attached file to confirm we are talking about the same thing)

Thank you for taking the time to look at this. There is certainly a lot of little bits needed to get a C++ Managed Build project to "just work" and I look forward to supporting you where I can.


Jonah Graham
Kichwa Coders

On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 09:11, Joost Kraaijeveld <J.Kraaijeveld@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

My immediate personal problem is solved by placing a comment on line 62
of to prevent
LlvmPreferenceStore.addStdLibUnix() being called.

I suspect that the same should be done on line 59 but I have no Windows
with MinGW to test it with.


Joost Kraaijeveld
Hommelseweg 123
6821 LD Arnhem

cdt-dev mailing list
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit

Attachment: Screenshot_2020-01-17_12-16-40.png
Description: PNG image

Back to the top