[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] Makefile project created with new project wizard cannot resolve standard includes
|
It's one of the sadest mistakes we made along the way, making Makefile projects from managed build. That's one of the things I want to fix with the new template and Core Build.
Feel free to fix up the wording in the template descriptions to make it clearer, though.
Doug.
-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nathan Ridge
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 12:58 PM
To: CDT General developers list. <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Makefile project created with new project wizard cannot resolve standard includes
Ah, I see what you mean: if you select e.g. "C++ Managed Build" on the first page, you get the first page of the old wizard, where you can then select "Makefile project". I didn't realize that.
That said, someone who wants to create a Makefile project might not know that, and think their only choice is to select the experimental "Makefile" option on the first page. (And in any case, it's fairly counter-intuitive that the way to create a Makefile project is to select a "Managed Build" option.)
Regards,
Nate
________________________________________
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx <cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: April 16, 2018 1:55:09 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Makefile project created with new project wizard cannot resolve standard includes
It's not that hidden. It's the C and C++ Managed Build templates. They start up the old wizards.
-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nathan Ridge
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2018 2:24 PM
To: CDT General developers list. <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Makefile project created with new project wizard cannot resolve standard includes
> Yes, the (Experimental) warning is pretty significant.
Thanks, that's good to know.
The question remains: why are we hiding the old wizard if it's replacement is not ready?
Regards,
Nate
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
