Re: [cdt-dev] CMake plugins

[Morgner Felix <felix.morgner@xxxxxx>]

Hi list,

I am currently working on CDT based CMake integration myself for my semester project. I plan on implementing project
creation as well as import/sync, an editor with semantic completion, and CMake server integration. I feel it would be
reasonable to join forces on this. I will be talking to my supervisor tomorrow, and wanted you to know that I would be
very much interested in contributing to the CDT CMake integration.

Felix

On Wed, 2017-06-07 at 14:43 +0000, Doug Schaefer wrote:
> I think it would be good to aim at the December release for official CMake support.
> 
> Ideally we need an editor with at least syntax highlighting. Content assist would be awesome. We can either build our own editor, maybe using the new Generic Text Editor, or try and convince the CMakeEd gang to relicense and contribute. (Despite old copyright dates, it looks like it’s actively developed by a couple of people).
> 
> The other major item is to make sure users can create different build configurations. Right now everything is driven by the Launch Bar and the configuration is selected based on Launch Mode and Launch Target type. I have a start on a Build settings tab on the launch configuration which may be close to enough.
> 
> The CMake Server support would be cool too. Then I think we’d be in good shape.
> 
> I do have an itch to scratch to learn the Generic Editor but if someone has a start on one already, please let us know.
> Cheers,
> Doug.
> 
> 
> From: <cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Jesper Eskilson <Jesper.Eskilson@xxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 at 2:56 AM
> To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CMake plugins
> 
> > I've been meaning to allocate some time to improve the CMake-plugins, but I haven't got very far. I have implemented support for the CMake server API (which is still in Gerrit), but not much else: https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/94349/.
> > 
> > /Jesper
> > 
> > From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx <cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 8:58 PM
> > To: CDT General developers list.
> > Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CMake plugins
> >  
> > 
> > From: <cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Jonah Graham <jonah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reply-To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Monday, June 5, 2017 at 2:55 PM
> > To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [cdt-dev] CMake plugins
> > 
> > > Hi devs, 
> > > 
> > > Is it intentional that the CMake plug-ins are not published to Oxygen simrel repo? I know they are experimental, but it ia harder to find them not on the simrel. 
> > 
> > Yes. They are experimental. So experimental I don’t really want the general public using them. There are still a lot of workflows that are cumbersome, hard coded, etc.
> > 
> > > Thanks, 
> > > Jonah 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev