Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] Removal of lrparser from CDT

I guess it was aimed at the general CDT community. The proposal is to remove a piece of functionality that a downstream project is using. I think that would be ok, provided that functionality can be achieved in some other way.

Greg

On Mar 9, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Andrew Gvozdev <angvoz.dev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

If you asking me - I can only commit to support XLC error parser.

Thanks,
Andrew

On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Greg Watson <g.watson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
PTP definitely wants to continue UPC support. I’m not familiar with the UPC parser, but it looks like it has dependencies on internal interfaces. I’d be willing to move the UPC to PTP, but that would mean CDT would need to provide sufficient API to support language extensions like this. Is that something you would be willing to do?

Greg

On Mar 9, 2016, at 9:38 AM, Andrew Gvozdev <angvoz.dev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I guess they might miss on some of the discussion though. 

On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 9:34 AM, <ptp-dev-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You must subscribe to this list before posting.  Please go to
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo to subscribe to the list,
then try again.  Perhaps you are already subscribed using another
email address; if that is the case, please send email to this list
using the email address you've used to subscribe.

Thanks,
Andrew 

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, they're on the distribution list of the e-mail ;)

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Mike Kucera <mikekucera@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The PTP project may still be using it for the UPC parser. You may want to check with them to see if they still need it.

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hey gang,

As part of our discussion on clean-up of CDT for CDT 9.0 we asked the question whether we could remove the lrparser and everything that depends on it. As far as we can tell, this work is un-maintained and is preventing us from making some important API changes.

We are proposing to remove it but will await word from the community to put a hold on that move.

Let us know in the next two weeks.

Thanks,
Doug.

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev


_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev


_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev


_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev


Back to the top