Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] Coordinated testing (max 2 hours)

We should be using the ids as returned by GDB.  I guess the core files does not store those ids or GDB does not process then properly. Something to check with GDB.



----- Original Message -----
From: Alvaro Sanchez <alvsan09@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 03/06/2014 17:53
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Coordinated testing (max 2 hours)

While testing the functionality for the  post-morterm core file, 

I noticed the thread ids don't correspond to the original session, 
I tested with Kepler and it also does not reflect the original thread id's, 

Does any one know if there is a limitation to resolve the original thread ids or is this a Bug ?


On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Cool. That is nice. Maybe not the most user friendly install, but yeah, pulling off isn't as great as it used to be. There are lots of alternatives to make up though.


From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of kesselhaus [kesselhaus@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 4:33 PM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Coordinated testing (max 2 hours)

I'm not sure, if that fits into required test environment, but I use the gcc from
They have an gcc-4.9 version there, which also includes gdb-7.7
I like that environment much more to setup on windows than msys/mingw.

Am 02.06.2014 19:22, schrieb Abeer Bagul:
For the Windows column of Section 2, just checked that MinGW latest contains only gdb 7.6.1-1 so the minimum requirement mentioned in the testing doc, i.e. gdb 7.7 is not met. Is there any other way to compile gdb7.7 for mingw? I really dont want to go thru the hassle of installing cygwin.

Abeer Bagul
Cadence (Tensilica) Pune

On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Please update the shared document, so all results are in one central place.

Thanks Abeer for your help!
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of Abeer Bagul [abeer4eclipse@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: June 2, 2014 1:07 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Coordinated testing (max 2 hours)

Hi All,

I have done the testing for Section 2: Local Debug today. All the tests are OK in this section, should I mark the doc or just write up the Pass results in a mail?
I have used Eclipse CDT RC2 downloaded from the Eclipse Download site, Developers section.


cdt-dev mailing list

cdt-dev mailing list

Back to the top