Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] [ptp-dev] Screen-cast of Remote Project Prototype Demo

I have a conflict at 14:00 EST on 2/28.

The other slots are fine.

Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
IBM Toronto

Inactive hide details for Jeff Johnston ---02/24/2012 06:13:22 PM---Hi Roland, A conference call would be a good idea.  I can sJeff Johnston ---02/24/2012 06:13:22 PM---Hi Roland, A conference call would be a good idea. I can set up a one hour call.

From: Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Parallel Tools Platform general developers <ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sami Wagiaalla <swagiaal@xxxxxxxxxx>, "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 02/24/2012 06:13 PM
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] [ptp-dev] Screen-cast of Remote Project Prototype Demo
Sent by: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

Hi Roland,

A conference call would be a good idea.  I can set up a one hour call.
How do any of the following proposed dates and times for this following
week work for you, Chris, et. al.?

  Tue Feb 28  1:30- 2:30 pm EST
  Wed Feb 29 11:00-12:00 am EST
  Wed Feb 29  1:30- 2:30 pm EST
  Fri Mar 02 11:00-12:00 am EST
  Fri Mar 02  1:30- 2:30 pm EST

These times are clear for Andrew, Sami, and myself on this end.


-- Jeff J.

On 02/23/2012 04:53 PM, Roland Schulz wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> Looks nice and it would be great to have remote support together with
> autotools support.
> We already have two different remote project types in PTP. Besides the
> original RDT, which Chris described as a reply to your first mail, we
> also have the synchronized project type. While it is slower if one wants
> to only add a few remote files, it is often faster when editing many
> files and it works with several Eclipse plugins (e.g. Photran,
> PerformanceTools) which don't work with the original RDT.
> In case you are not familiar with that solution you can find more
> information at:
> (wiki page with summary)
> (help
> pages with tutorial)
> (screencast)
> (the original bug
> with the reasons to have a 2nd remote project types and links to earlier
> prototypes)
> As Chris mentioned to your original email: It might make sense to have a
> conference call and see how the different remote project types could be
> combined into a common framework to avoid duplicated effort and have a
> common user interface.
> Roland
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx
> <
mailto:jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>     Hello,
>     Now that we are all done with Indigo SR2 and Juno M5, I would like to
>     continue discussion of my prototype for supporting remote projects
>     directly in CDT via proxies for file and command access.
>     A picture paints a thousand words so I have put together a short
>     demonstration in ogg format that shows how the prototype works in
>     creating a remote Autotools C project using an RSE connection from my
>     laptop to my desktop.  The code for the prototype has already been
>     posted in a bug.  I have since verified in the bug that it is EPL and
>     that I have permission from my employer Red Hat to submit it.
>     The demo can be found in ogg form here:
>     If you are using a Windows system, you might need to use VLC to view it.
>     -- Jeff J. (Red Hat Inc)
>     _______________________________________________
>     cdt-dev mailing list
>     cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <
> --
> ORNL/UT Center for Molecular Biophysics <>
> 865-241-1537 <tel:865-241-1537>, ORNL PO BOX 2008 MS6309
> _______________________________________________
> ptp-dev mailing list
> ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

cdt-dev mailing list

GIF image

Back to the top