The bug is not fixed yet:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7090976
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Schaefer, Doug
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 2:06 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT and Java 1.6
The latest java 6 is fine. IT was just updates 23 and 24 I believe.
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Alexiev, Dobrin
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 12:52 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT and Java 1.6
Considering that Java 6 will crash in some cases while JIT compiling some CDT code, I prefer not to go to Java 6.
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=360855
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=357757
Alternatively the CDT code can easily be refactored to prevent the ( known) JVM crash.
My two cents.
Dobrin
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Sergey Prigogin
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 7:47 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT and Java 1.6
CDT now requires Java 1.6.
-sergey
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Marc Khouzam <marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've never felt a very strong urge to go to 1.6, but I personally don't mind.
String.isEmpty() and @Override for interface would be nice.
From:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Sergey Prigogin
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 7:50 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: [cdt-dev] CDT and Java 1.6
Are there any objections against introducing dependency on Java 1.6 in CDT 9? The reasons for introducing the dependency are: String.isEmpty() method, Deque insterface, @Override annotations for implemented interface methods.
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
|