Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] CDT and Java 1.6

I've never felt a very strong urge to go to 1.6, but I personally don't mind.
String.isEmpty() and @Override for interface would be nice.

From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sergey Prigogin
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 7:50 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: [cdt-dev] CDT and Java 1.6

Are there any objections against introducing dependency on Java 1.6 in CDT 9? The reasons for introducing the dependency are: String.isEmpty() method, Deque insterface, @Override annotations for implemented interface methods.


Back to the top