Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] Vote for Committer status for Patrick Chuong was started by Pawel Piech

Hi Alena,

I didn't ask Pawel for nomination. However, I would be honoured if I was accepted as a committer. As Teodor mentioned, the most significant contribution that I have made to date is the flexible breakpoints view. While it is a platform contribution it is probably benefits CDT community the most, at least members that need to support different types of HW based breakpoint. I am currently prototyping and working with community on pin & clone support and plan to be involved in development of this feature. However, I don't want to bypass the process and will continue to contribute patches regardless of today's decision. 


-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alena Laskavaia
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 4:43 PM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Vote for Committer status for Patrick Chuong was started by Pawel Piech

Well you are saying you did it as a "reward"? I don't think it is
right approach.
First of all lets not involve platform into this decision, because if
you think he has enough
contributions for the platform you should have nominated him for the platform.
Does he plan to be an active committer on cdt project? If he committed
7 patches over 5 years I won't call
it active... What is he planning on contributing to cdt?
Does he actively participate in cdt dev list? (I have not even herd of
him at all before cdt summit...)
Does he ask you to nominate him or it was your idea? Can I hear from
him actually?

On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Pawel Piech <pawel.piech@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I feel I should apologize here, because I sort of "winged" this nomination
> and I didn't take the appropriate amount of time to explain my motivation to
> nominate Patrick.  Unlike most committer nomination, which are made for a
> colleague, I have no vested interest in this nomination.  I've simply found
> that Patrick's bugs and patches have been very helpful to me and I hoped
> that I could make it easier for him to continue to help out.  Also,
> especially after today's call where we put Mike Wilson on the spot over
> platform commit rights, I thought it would be appropriate to recognize his
> contributions which have come over the last 5 years (maybe more).
> Cheers,
> Pawel
> On 10/05/2010 12:03 PM, portal on behalf of Pawel Piech wrote:
>> tools.cdt Committers,
>> This automatically generated message signals that Pawel Piech has
>> nominated
>> Patrick Chuong as a Committer on the tools.cdt project. The reason given
>> is
>> as follows:
>> Patrick has committed several fixes in breakpoints and disassembly views
>> and DSF.  He also recently helped with migrating the Breakpoints view to
>> flexible hierarchy in Platform, making him an expert in this area.
>> The vote is being held via the MyFoundation portal: voters *must* use the
>> portal for the votes to be properly recorded.  The voting will continue
>> until either all 25 existing Committers have voted or until they have been
>> given enough time to vote, even if they do not do so (defined as at least
>> one week). Patrick Chuong must receive at least three +1s and no -1s for a
>> successful election.
>> Eligible Committers must cast their votes through their My Foundation
>> portal page (do NOT just reply to this email; your vote will not be
>> correctly recorded unless you use the portal):
>> The project Committers eligible to vote are:
>>     James Blackburn
>>     Francois Chouinard
>>     John Cortell
>>     David Dubrow
>>     Emanuel Graf
>>     Andrew Gvozdev
>>     Mikhail Khodjaiants
>>     Marc Khouzam
>>     Vivian Kong
>>     Mike Kucera
>>     Elena Laskavaia
>>     Anton Leherbauer
>>     Teodor Madan
>>     Warren Paul
>>     Pawel Piech
>>     Sergey Prigogin
>>     Chris Recoskie
>>     Randy Rohrbach
>>     Ken Ryall
>>     Doug Schaefer
>>     Markus Schorn
>>     Ed Swartz
>>     L. Frank Turovich
>>     Ling Wang
>>     Ted Williams
>> *NOTE*: Successful elections are left open for a maximum of 60 days to
>> allow for processing of paperwork.  After that time the election will be
>> expired, regardless of its current status.  Should papework processing on
>> the part of the candidate take more time than allowed, a new election will
>> have to be held.
>> If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact your project
>> lead, PMC member, or the EMO<emo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdt-dev mailing list
>> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cdt-dev mailing list

Back to the top