[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] [DSF] FinalLaunchSequence extensibility
|
On 08/07/2010 2:54 PM, Marc Khouzam wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mikhail Khodjaiants
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 2:27 PM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] [DSF] FinalLaunchSequence extensibility
On 08/07/2010 2:04 PM, Marc Khouzam wrote:
That is interesting. It's like the subSequence solution, with
each subSequence being a single step. How would you define the
step ids?
Yes, that's correct. See the Andy Jin's comment regarding granularity.
I was thinking of the traditional Eclipse style strings:
<plugin_id>.steps.gdbinit, for instance.
Thinking about it some more, isn't this very much like Vladimir's early
suggestion:
- Add protected members for each step of FinalLaunchSequence, e.g.:
protected Step getTrackerStep = new Step() { .... } ;
- Add factory methods, e.g.:
protected Step getTrackerStep() { .... }
It is similar. But the difference is to have a steps library outside of
FinalLaunchSequence.