Re: [cdt-dev] [DSF] FinalLaunchSequence extensibility

[Mikhail Khodjaiants <mikhailkhod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 08/07/2010 2:04 PM, Marc Khouzam wrote:
> That is interesting.  It's like the subSequence solution, with
> each subSequence being a single step.  How would you define the
> step ids?
>    
Yes, that's correct. See the Andy Jin's comment regarding granularity.
I was thinking of the traditional Eclipse style strings: 
<plugin_id>.steps.gdbinit, for instance.